Logo review of db, pb

Scalability versatility

Bold, thick lines will remain visible even at small sizes.

Hand-drawn style and uneven lines compromise clarity in smaller applications.
Logo lacks polish, limiting use across professional or branded materials.
Highly problematic shape and interpretation means it is not suitable for most real-world applications.

Balance alignment

Composition is extremely unbalanced: shapes are unevenly sized and lack symmetry.
No clear alignment; elements do not feel intentionally placed.

Originality

Distinct from typical generic symbols due to crude hand-drawn approach.

Originality undermined by accidental resemblance to inappropriate symbols.
No creative twist or clever use of form; interpretation feels accidental rather than intentional.

Aesthetic look

Crude, unfinished appearance.
Shape is aesthetically unpleasing and will almost certainly be misinterpreted.

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

Logo very clearly resembles intimate male anatomy, making it inappropriate for general branding.
Design is highly ambiguous and susceptible to negative interpretation.

Color harmony

Simple black-and-white palette avoids color confusion.
Single color treatment supports clarity.

Lack of any supplementary color may limit distinction or brand personality.