Logo review of GLAM HAVEN

Legibility

Consistent thickness and geometric character create a recognizable aesthetic.

Letterforms are overly stylized, making some characters (G, L, H, V, E) hard to distinguish at a glance.
Letter spacing is irregular, which further reduces quick readability.
Low readability at smaller sizes or from a distance.

Scalability versatility

Bold forms ensure the logo remains visible at larger sizes (e.g., store signage, billboards).

Excessive stylization and geometric detail may not translate well to smaller applications like website favicons or business cards.
May lose legibility in embroidery or small merchandise due to thin counter spaces within some letters.

Balance alignment

Overall structure is centered with a reasonable horizontal balance between the two words.

The visual weight fluctuates between letters, especially with G and H being heavier, causing slight optical imbalance.
Mixed geometric treatments result in inconsistent rhythm.

Originality

Custom, geometric letterforms give a distinct and memorable character.
The playfulness of the typography indicates a unique attempt to differentiate from typical beauty or glam brands.

Despite custom elements, the geometric/retro wordmark aesthetic is trending and not entirely original in this sector.

Aesthetic look

The logo has a striking, fashionable presence.
Bold geometric style aligns with 'glam' positioning.

Aesthetic is subjective and could polarize; some may find the letter style forced or dated.
Not universally appealing for a wide audience.

Dual meaning and misinterpretations

No inappropriate symbols or unintended imagery were detected in the composition.

Color harmony

Simple black and white palette is timeless and versatile.
No risk of color clashing or overuse.